On flows, sentiment, liquidity, and Bitcoin’s current regime

> Executive Snapshot

Bitcoin enters 2026 under visible macro and structural pressure. The current regime is defined by weak marginal demand, tightening financial conditions, fading retail participation, and persistent negative narratives. While long-term monetary dynamics remain supportive, near-term price action is being driven by adverse flows rather than conviction buying.

This note examines the forces shaping Bitcoin’s recent performance and the conditions that may alter its trajectory.

> Geopolitical and Narrative Headwinds

A growing global perception frames Bitcoin as an extension of U.S. financial power, a mechanism to indirectly monetize American debt. While this interpretation is ill-founded and applies more to their stablecoin strategy and not BTC, perception matters in markets.

In many jurisdictions, Bitcoin is increasingly viewed as a geopolitical instrument rather than a neutral monetary network. This narrative has dampened international enthusiasm and weighs on adoption and capital inflows in the short term.

> U.S. Equity Overhang and the AI Trade

Bitcoin remains tightly coupled to broader risk assets, particularly U.S. technology equities.

With the NASDAQ retreating from recent highs, concerns are growing around the sustainability of the AI-led capital expenditure cycle. Massive investments by firms such as Microsoft and Oracle are now being scrutinized for returns and efficiency.

A potential unwinding of the AI trade would pressure risk appetite broadly. In this environment, Bitcoin continues to trade as a high-beta liquidity asset rather than a defensive store of value.

> Collapse in Retail Participation

Retail participation has materially declined since the October liquidation events. These episodes triggered significant losses and forced exits among smaller participants.

At present, Bitcoin lacks grassroots momentum. Attention has shifted toward commodities, particularly gold and silver, which are perceived as safer and more immediate inflation hedges.

Without sustained retail engagement, speculative demand remains muted.

> Institutional Bid: Expectations vs Reality

The launch of Bitcoin ETFs created expectations of a persistent institutional bid. That thesis is currently under pressure.

Recent ETF outflows have weakened market structure. Similarly, treasury-focused firms such as Strategy now trade near net asset value, limiting their ability to raise capital and accumulate additional Bitcoin.

The result is a vacuum in structural demand, neither institutions nor corporates are currently providing consistent support.

> Flow Dominance and Fragile Market Depth

Bitcoin pricing is driven by marginal flows rather than outstanding supply.

In this context, relatively small liquidation events can produce disproportionate moves. Recent forced selling episodes have produced some of the largest daily candles in Bitcoin’s history, reflecting thin liquidity and weak absorptive capacity in the current regime.

> Monetary Policy and Funding Pressures

Two macro factors further complicate conditions:

First, the potential appointment of Kevin Warsh as Fed Chair is interpreted as a hawkish signal. Markets associate this with tighter policy and higher real rates, both unfavorable for speculative assets.

Second, the unwinding of yen-funded leverage reduces global risk capacity. Firms using low-cost funding to finance Bitcoin exposure are being forced to deleverage.

Together, these dynamics constrain leverage and suppress speculative flows.

> Financialization and Paper Bitcoin

The growing dominance of futures and options markets has increased Bitcoin’s financialization.

Synthetic exposure allows participants to trade Bitcoin without owning the underlying asset. This weakens scarcity dynamics and introduces greater scope for price manipulation and leverage-driven volatility.

While derivatives improve market efficiency, they dilute Bitcoin’s original supply-driven thesis.

> Sovereign Signals and Mixed Messaging

Some sovereign actors have recently reduced their exposure.

Bhutan has sold portions of its Bitcoin holdings. El Salvador has diversified into gold alongside continued Bitcoin accumulation. These moves weaken the narrative of uninterrupted sovereign adoption.

Although small in absolute terms, these signals influence sentiment.

> Public Perception and Education Gap

Bitcoin continues to suffer from weak public understanding.

Its purpose, mechanics, and long-term implications remain poorly communicated. Negative stereotypes and ideological resistance persist across societies.

This limits organic adoption and reinforces cyclical boom-bust participation rather than durable usage.

> Mining Economics and Network Stress

Recent months have seen rising pressure on miners.

Production costs have moved higher while spot prices have weakened, compressing margins. This has coincided with periods of declining hash rate and reduced network activity, reflecting operational stress and capital constraints.

In response, several large mining operators are increasingly pivoting toward artificial intelligence and high-performance computing workloads, where power infrastructure and data centers can generate more stable cash flows.

This represents a structural shift. A mining sector less dependent on pure Bitcoin economics may become less forced to sell in downturns, but it also changes the incentive dynamics that historically tied miners tightly to BTC price cycles.

> Structural Tailwind: Liquidity Is Destiny

Despite near-term pressure, Bitcoin remains highly sensitive to global liquidity conditions.

Historical precedent suggests that the United States is structurally unwilling to pursue sustained fiscal restraint. Over multiple decades, policy responses have consistently favored:

• •Lower interest rates
• •Balance sheet expansion
• •Debt monetization
• •Bond market support

Yield Curve Control, effectively monetizing deficits via central bank purchases, remains a plausible future policy.

Such regimes are fundamentally supportive of scarce monetary assets such as BTC.

> De-Dollarization and Sovereign Optionality

Global efforts to reduce dollar dependence continue.

Gold remains the primary beneficiary, but alternative reserves are being explored. From a portfolio perspective, Bitcoin offers asymmetric optionality due to its relatively small market capitalization.

Rumored holdings by countries such as Qatar and the UAE reflects this logic, even if adoption remains gradual.

> Regime Assessment

Current conditions reflect:

• •Tight liquidity
• •Weak marginal demand
• •Limited institutional support
• •Fading retail participation
• •Elevated narrative risk
• •Rising operational stress among miners

This is a flow-driven, fragile regime where rallies struggle to sustain and volatility remains elevated.

> What to Watch: Spring into Early Summer

Without making price predictions, it is reasonable to monitor the period into May for early signs of regime change.

Historically, shifts in sentiment and positioning often lag major drawdowns by several months. If conditions are going to improve meaningfully in 2026, early signals are likely to emerge in this window.

Key indicators include:

• •A shift toward easier financial conditions
• •Sustained ETF inflows
• •Stabilization in funding and leverage
• •Reduced miner selling pressure

The convergence of these signals would suggest a transition from flow-dominated weakness to more durable demand.

> In Closing

Bitcoin today sits between two realities.

In the short term, it trades as a leveraged risk asset in a tightening world. Flows dominate, narratives weigh heavily, and structural demand is limited.

In the long term, unresolved sovereign debt dynamics, monetary expansion, and de-dollarization pressures continue to favor scarce, neutral monetary networks.

This tension defines the current regime.

Understanding it, rather than predicting price, remains the highest-probability edge.

> About Tatv

Tatv is a collection of essays on markets, systems, and execution in the age of crypto and AI. The focus is on structure over narrative, process over prediction, and building tools that operate within markets rather than merely commenting on them.

If this piece resonated, you can follow our work:

- Tatv essays and frameworks: https://tatv.ai

- Airavat — execution and trading systems: https://airavat.xyz

- Founder on X: https://x.com/gautam_airavat